461 lines
17 KiB
Markdown
461 lines
17 KiB
Markdown
# Security Policy
|
|
|
|
## 🛡️ **Our Security Commitment**
|
|
|
|
The c77_secure_db extension is designed with security as the primary concern. This document outlines our security policies, vulnerability reporting procedures, and the security architecture of the extension.
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 **Reporting Security Vulnerabilities**
|
|
|
|
### **Please DO NOT report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues.**
|
|
|
|
If you discover a security vulnerability in c77_secure_db, please report it responsibly:
|
|
|
|
### **Preferred Reporting Method**
|
|
- **Email**: [security@yourcompany.com](mailto:security@yourcompany.com)
|
|
- **Subject**: `[SECURITY] c77_secure_db Vulnerability Report`
|
|
- **Encryption**: Use our PGP key if possible (key ID: YOUR_PGP_KEY_ID)
|
|
|
|
### **What to Include**
|
|
1. **Description**: Clear description of the vulnerability
|
|
2. **Steps to Reproduce**: Detailed steps to reproduce the issue
|
|
3. **Impact Assessment**: Your assessment of the potential impact
|
|
4. **Proof of Concept**: If available, a proof-of-concept (responsibly disclosed)
|
|
5. **Suggested Fix**: If you have ideas for remediation
|
|
6. **Contact Information**: How we can reach you for follow-up
|
|
|
|
### **Response Timeline**
|
|
- **Initial Response**: Within 24 hours of report
|
|
- **Vulnerability Assessment**: Within 72 hours
|
|
- **Fix Development**: Timeline varies based on severity
|
|
- **Security Advisory**: Published after fix is available
|
|
|
|
### **Responsible Disclosure**
|
|
We request that you:
|
|
- Give us reasonable time to address the issue before public disclosure
|
|
- Avoid accessing or modifying data that doesn't belong to you
|
|
- Don't perform actions that could harm the availability of the service
|
|
- Only test against your own installations
|
|
|
|
## 🔐 **Security Architecture**
|
|
|
|
### **Multi-Layer Security Model**
|
|
|
|
c77_secure_db implements defense-in-depth with multiple security layers:
|
|
|
|
#### **Layer 1: Trigger Protection**
|
|
- **Purpose**: Prevent all direct database modifications
|
|
- **Mechanism**: PostgreSQL triggers on all protected tables
|
|
- **Coverage**: INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE operations
|
|
- **Bypass Prevention**: Cannot be disabled without superuser access
|
|
|
|
#### **Layer 2: Token Authorization**
|
|
- **Purpose**: Authorize legitimate operations
|
|
- **Mechanism**: Short-lived, single-use authorization tokens
|
|
- **Token Lifespan**: 5 seconds maximum
|
|
- **Session Binding**: Tokens tied to specific database sessions
|
|
- **Replay Prevention**: Single-use tokens prevent replay attacks
|
|
|
|
#### **Layer 3: Content Integrity**
|
|
- **Purpose**: Detect unauthorized data modifications
|
|
- **Mechanism**: SHA-256 cryptographic hashing
|
|
- **Coverage**: All business data (excluding system columns)
|
|
- **Verification**: On-demand and scheduled integrity checks
|
|
|
|
#### **Layer 4: Audit Trail**
|
|
- **Purpose**: Complete operation logging for forensics
|
|
- **Coverage**: All secure operations, successes and failures
|
|
- **Retention**: Configurable retention periods for compliance
|
|
- **Immutability**: Audit logs protected by same security layers
|
|
|
|
#### **Layer 5: Access Control (Optional)**
|
|
- **Purpose**: Role-based permission enforcement
|
|
- **Integration**: c77_rbac extension for advanced permissions
|
|
- **Granularity**: Feature-based and scope-based access control
|
|
- **Fallback**: Secure operation without RBAC if not available
|
|
|
|
### **Threat Model**
|
|
|
|
#### **Threats Mitigated**
|
|
|
|
| Threat Category | Mitigation Strategy | Security Layer |
|
|
|----------------|-------------------|----------------|
|
|
| **SQL Injection** | Trigger protection blocks direct SQL | Layer 1 |
|
|
| **Application Bypass** | Token validation required for all operations | Layer 2 |
|
|
| **Data Tampering** | Content hash verification detects changes | Layer 3 |
|
|
| **Replay Attacks** | Single-use, time-limited tokens | Layer 2 |
|
|
| **Session Hijacking** | Session-specific token binding | Layer 2 |
|
|
| **Privilege Escalation** | Controlled function execution with SECURITY DEFINER | All Layers |
|
|
| **Audit Log Tampering** | Audit data protected by same security layers | Layer 4 |
|
|
| **Unauthorized Access** | RBAC integration with scope-based permissions | Layer 5 |
|
|
|
|
#### **Assumptions**
|
|
|
|
Our security model assumes:
|
|
- PostgreSQL superuser access is properly controlled
|
|
- Database network communication is encrypted (TLS)
|
|
- Application servers are reasonably secure
|
|
- System administrators follow security best practices
|
|
- Regular security updates are applied
|
|
|
|
#### **Known Limitations**
|
|
|
|
- **PostgreSQL Superuser**: Can bypass all protections (by design)
|
|
- **Physical Access**: Direct file system access can compromise data
|
|
- **Memory Dumps**: Active tokens might be visible in memory dumps
|
|
- **Time Synchronization**: Token expiration depends on accurate system time
|
|
- **Extension Dependencies**: Security depends on pgcrypto extension integrity
|
|
|
|
### **Cryptographic Details**
|
|
|
|
#### **Content Hashing**
|
|
- **Algorithm**: SHA-256
|
|
- **Input**: Sorted key-value pairs of business data
|
|
- **Salt**: None (deterministic hashing for verification)
|
|
- **Exclusions**: System columns (timestamps, hashes, etc.)
|
|
- **Performance**: Optimized for production workloads
|
|
|
|
#### **Token Generation**
|
|
- **Source**: PostgreSQL's `gen_random_uuid()` function
|
|
- **Entropy**: Based on system randomness
|
|
- **Format**: UUID v4 standard
|
|
- **Storage**: Temporary database table with automatic cleanup
|
|
|
|
## 🔒 **Security Controls**
|
|
|
|
### **Access Controls**
|
|
|
|
#### **Installation Requirements**
|
|
- **Superuser Required**: Initial installation requires PostgreSQL superuser
|
|
- **Post-Installation**: Regular users can operate with granted roles
|
|
|
|
#### **Runtime Permissions**
|
|
- **c77_secure_db_readonly**: Read-only operations (freshness checks, health monitoring)
|
|
- **c77_secure_db_user**: Standard secure operations (insert, update, delete)
|
|
- **c77_secure_db_admin**: Administrative functions (hash verification, schema management)
|
|
|
|
#### **RBAC Integration**
|
|
- **Optional**: Works with or without c77_rbac extension
|
|
- **Granular**: Feature-based permissions (secure_db_insert, secure_db_update, etc.)
|
|
- **Scoped**: Department, region, or custom scope-based access
|
|
- **Audited**: All RBAC decisions logged in audit trail
|
|
|
|
### **Data Protection**
|
|
|
|
#### **Data at Rest**
|
|
- **Database Files**: Protected by PostgreSQL's standard file permissions
|
|
- **Hash Storage**: Content hashes stored alongside data in same security context
|
|
- **Audit Logs**: Subject to same database security as operational data
|
|
- **Tokens**: Automatically purged expired tokens (default: daily cleanup)
|
|
|
|
#### **Data in Transit**
|
|
- **Application to Database**: Use PostgreSQL TLS connections
|
|
- **Token Transmission**: Tokens transmitted via secure database session
|
|
- **Audit Data**: Logged locally within database, no network transmission
|
|
|
|
#### **Data Processing**
|
|
- **Hash Calculation**: Performed within database using pgcrypto
|
|
- **Token Validation**: Atomic database operations with automatic cleanup
|
|
- **Operation Logging**: Immediate logging within same transaction context
|
|
|
|
### **Monitoring and Alerting**
|
|
|
|
#### **Security Monitoring**
|
|
```sql
|
|
-- Key security metrics to monitor
|
|
SELECT
|
|
'Error Rate' as metric,
|
|
count(*) FILTER (WHERE success = false)::numeric / count(*) * 100 as percentage
|
|
FROM c77_secure_db_operation_audit
|
|
WHERE created_at > now() - interval '1 hour';
|
|
|
|
-- Token anomalies
|
|
SELECT count(*) as active_tokens
|
|
FROM c77_secure_db_auth_tokens
|
|
WHERE expires_at > now();
|
|
|
|
-- Unusual access patterns
|
|
SELECT user_name, count(*) as operations
|
|
FROM c77_secure_db_operation_audit
|
|
WHERE created_at > now() - interval '1 hour'
|
|
GROUP BY user_name
|
|
HAVING count(*) > 100;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### **Recommended Alerts**
|
|
- **Error Rate > 5%**: Indicates potential security issues or attacks
|
|
- **Active Tokens > 100**: May indicate token cleanup problems
|
|
- **Hash Mismatches**: Critical security alert requiring immediate investigation
|
|
- **Off-Hours Activity**: Unusual activity outside business hours
|
|
- **Repeated Failures**: Multiple failed operations from same user
|
|
|
|
## 🔄 **Security Update Process**
|
|
|
|
### **Severity Classification**
|
|
|
|
#### **Critical (CVSS 9.0-10.0)**
|
|
- **Timeline**: Patch within 24-48 hours
|
|
- **Examples**: Authentication bypass, data corruption, privilege escalation
|
|
- **Response**: Emergency release, immediate security advisory
|
|
|
|
#### **High (CVSS 7.0-8.9)**
|
|
- **Timeline**: Patch within 1 week
|
|
- **Examples**: Information disclosure, denial of service
|
|
- **Response**: Priority release, security advisory
|
|
|
|
#### **Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9)**
|
|
- **Timeline**: Patch within 30 days
|
|
- **Examples**: Less severe information disclosure, limited DoS
|
|
- **Response**: Regular release cycle, documented in changelog
|
|
|
|
#### **Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9)**
|
|
- **Timeline**: Next regular release
|
|
- **Examples**: Minor information disclosure, edge cases
|
|
- **Response**: Standard release process
|
|
|
|
### **Update Distribution**
|
|
|
|
#### **Security Advisories**
|
|
- **Format**: GitHub Security Advisories
|
|
- **Content**: CVE ID, affected versions, mitigation steps, upgrade instructions
|
|
- **Distribution**: GitHub, mailing list, website
|
|
|
|
#### **Patch Releases**
|
|
- **Naming**: Increment patch version (e.g., 2.0 → 2.0.1)
|
|
- **Content**: Security fixes only, minimal functional changes
|
|
- **Testing**: Automated security test suite must pass
|
|
- **Backwards Compatibility**: Maintained unless security requires breaking changes
|
|
|
|
#### **Upgrade Instructions**
|
|
```sql
|
|
-- Security update process
|
|
-- 1. Backup your database
|
|
pg_dump your_database > backup_before_security_update.sql
|
|
|
|
-- 2. Install new extension files
|
|
sudo cp c77_secure_db--2.0.1.sql $(pg_config --sharedir)/extension/
|
|
|
|
-- 3. Update extension
|
|
ALTER EXTENSION c77_secure_db UPDATE TO '2.0.1';
|
|
|
|
-- 4. Verify security update
|
|
SELECT c77_secure_db_run_all_tests();
|
|
-- Must return: "overall_status": "ALL_TESTS_PASSED"
|
|
|
|
-- 5. Check health after update
|
|
SELECT c77_secure_db_health_check();
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 📋 **Compliance and Standards**
|
|
|
|
### **Security Standards Alignment**
|
|
|
|
#### **NIST Cybersecurity Framework**
|
|
- **Identify**: Asset inventory, risk assessment procedures
|
|
- **Protect**: Access controls, data security, protective technology
|
|
- **Detect**: Security monitoring, anomaly detection
|
|
- **Respond**: Incident response procedures, forensic capabilities
|
|
- **Recover**: Recovery planning, backup and restore procedures
|
|
|
|
#### **OWASP Guidelines**
|
|
- **A01 Broken Access Control**: Prevented by trigger protection and RBAC
|
|
- **A02 Cryptographic Failures**: SHA-256 hashing with proper implementation
|
|
- **A03 Injection**: SQL injection prevented by trigger layer
|
|
- **A08 Software Integrity Failures**: Content hash verification
|
|
- **A09 Security Logging**: Comprehensive audit trail
|
|
|
|
#### **Database Security Best Practices**
|
|
- **Principle of Least Privilege**: Granular role-based permissions
|
|
- **Defense in Depth**: Multiple security layers
|
|
- **Audit Logging**: Complete operation trail
|
|
- **Data Integrity**: Cryptographic verification
|
|
- **Access Controls**: Authentication and authorization
|
|
|
|
### **Regulatory Considerations**
|
|
|
|
#### **HIPAA (Healthcare)**
|
|
- **Administrative Safeguards**: Access management, audit procedures
|
|
- **Physical Safeguards**: Database server protection (external to extension)
|
|
- **Technical Safeguards**: Access controls, audit logs, data integrity
|
|
|
|
#### **SOX (Financial)**
|
|
- **Internal Controls**: Automated security controls, segregation of duties
|
|
- **Audit Trail**: Complete transaction logging with timestamps
|
|
- **Data Integrity**: Hash verification for financial data
|
|
|
|
#### **GDPR (Privacy)**
|
|
- **Data Protection**: Encryption at rest and in transit (implementation-dependent)
|
|
- **Audit Requirements**: Complete processing logs
|
|
- **Right to Deletion**: Secure deletion capabilities (soft delete support)
|
|
|
|
## 🔍 **Security Testing**
|
|
|
|
### **Automated Security Tests**
|
|
|
|
The extension includes comprehensive security tests:
|
|
|
|
```sql
|
|
-- Run complete security test suite
|
|
SELECT c77_secure_db_run_all_tests();
|
|
|
|
-- Specific security tests
|
|
SELECT c77_secure_db_test_security();
|
|
|
|
-- RBAC integration tests
|
|
SELECT c77_secure_db_test_rbac_integration();
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### **Test Coverage**
|
|
- **Bypass Prevention**: Attempts to circumvent trigger protection
|
|
- **Token Security**: Token expiration, single-use validation, session binding
|
|
- **Hash Integrity**: Content hash calculation and verification
|
|
- **RBAC Integration**: Permission enforcement, scope validation
|
|
- **Error Handling**: Security-relevant error conditions
|
|
- **Performance**: Security overhead measurement
|
|
|
|
### **Security Validation Requirements**
|
|
|
|
#### **Pre-Release Testing**
|
|
- [ ] All security tests pass with 100% success rate
|
|
- [ ] No bypass vulnerabilities identified
|
|
- [ ] Performance impact within acceptable limits
|
|
- [ ] RBAC integration functions correctly
|
|
- [ ] Error handling doesn't leak sensitive information
|
|
- [ ] Audit logging captures all required events
|
|
|
|
#### **Production Deployment Validation**
|
|
```sql
|
|
-- Mandatory post-deployment security check
|
|
DO $
|
|
DECLARE
|
|
v_test_results jsonb;
|
|
BEGIN
|
|
-- Run security tests
|
|
SELECT c77_secure_db_run_all_tests() INTO v_test_results;
|
|
|
|
-- Verify all tests passed
|
|
IF (v_test_results->>'overall_status') != 'ALL_TESTS_PASSED' THEN
|
|
RAISE EXCEPTION 'DEPLOYMENT FAILED: Security tests did not pass. Status: %',
|
|
v_test_results->>'overall_status'
|
|
USING HINT = 'Do not use in production until all security tests pass';
|
|
END IF;
|
|
|
|
RAISE NOTICE 'Security validation passed - extension ready for production use';
|
|
END $;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 🚨 **Incident Response**
|
|
|
|
### **Security Incident Classifications**
|
|
|
|
#### **P0 - Critical Security Breach**
|
|
- **Definition**: Active exploitation, data compromise, or system compromise
|
|
- **Response Time**: Immediate (< 1 hour)
|
|
- **Actions**:
|
|
- Isolate affected systems
|
|
- Preserve forensic evidence
|
|
- Notify security team and management
|
|
- Begin incident response procedures
|
|
|
|
#### **P1 - High Security Risk**
|
|
- **Definition**: Vulnerability discovered, attempted exploitation, or suspicious activity
|
|
- **Response Time**: Within 4 hours
|
|
- **Actions**:
|
|
- Assess impact and risk
|
|
- Implement temporary mitigations
|
|
- Begin patch development
|
|
- Monitor for exploitation attempts
|
|
|
|
#### **P2 - Medium Security Issue**
|
|
- **Definition**: Lower-risk vulnerability or security concern
|
|
- **Response Time**: Within 24 hours
|
|
- **Actions**:
|
|
- Document and prioritize
|
|
- Plan remediation
|
|
- Schedule fix in next release cycle
|
|
|
|
### **Forensic Capabilities**
|
|
|
|
#### **Audit Trail Analysis**
|
|
```sql
|
|
-- Incident investigation queries
|
|
-- Identify suspicious activity patterns
|
|
SELECT
|
|
user_name,
|
|
operation_type,
|
|
count(*) as frequency,
|
|
min(created_at) as first_occurrence,
|
|
max(created_at) as last_occurrence,
|
|
array_agg(DISTINCT error_message) FILTER (WHERE success = false) as errors
|
|
FROM c77_secure_db_operation_audit
|
|
WHERE created_at BETWEEN 'incident_start_time' AND 'incident_end_time'
|
|
GROUP BY user_name, operation_type
|
|
ORDER BY frequency DESC;
|
|
|
|
-- Hash verification for tampered data
|
|
SELECT c77_secure_db_verify_content_hashes('affected_schema', 'affected_table');
|
|
|
|
-- Token analysis during incident window
|
|
SELECT
|
|
session_id,
|
|
operation_type,
|
|
count(*) as token_count,
|
|
min(created_at) as first_token,
|
|
max(expires_at) as last_expiry
|
|
FROM c77_secure_db_auth_tokens
|
|
WHERE created_at BETWEEN 'incident_start_time' AND 'incident_end_time'
|
|
GROUP BY session_id, operation_type;
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
#### **Evidence Preservation**
|
|
- **Audit Logs**: Immutable record of all operations
|
|
- **Hash Values**: Cryptographic proof of data state
|
|
- **Token Records**: Authorization trail for forensic analysis
|
|
- **System Logs**: PostgreSQL logs with detailed operation information
|
|
|
|
## 📞 **Security Contacts**
|
|
|
|
### **Security Team**
|
|
- **Primary Contact**: security@yourcompany.com
|
|
- **Response Time**: 24 hours maximum
|
|
- **Escalation**: Available for critical issues
|
|
|
|
### **Development Team**
|
|
- **Technical Contact**: developers@yourcompany.com
|
|
- **Availability**: Business hours
|
|
- **Expertise**: Extension architecture and implementation
|
|
|
|
### **Emergency Contacts**
|
|
- **After Hours**: emergency@yourcompany.com
|
|
- **Critical Issues**: Available 24/7
|
|
- **Response**: Within 1 hour for P0 incidents
|
|
|
|
## 📚 **Additional Resources**
|
|
|
|
### **Security Documentation**
|
|
- **[BEST_PRACTICES.md](BEST_PRACTICES.md)**: Comprehensive security best practices
|
|
- **[USAGE.md](USAGE.md)**: Security-focused usage examples
|
|
- **[EXAMPLES.md](EXAMPLES.md)**: Secure implementation patterns
|
|
|
|
### **External Resources**
|
|
- **PostgreSQL Security**: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/security.html
|
|
- **OWASP Database Security**: https://owasp.org/www-project-database-security/
|
|
- **NIST Cybersecurity Framework**: https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework
|
|
|
|
### **Security Tools**
|
|
- **pgaudit**: PostgreSQL auditing extension
|
|
- **pg_stat_statements**: Query performance and security monitoring
|
|
- **log_statement**: PostgreSQL statement logging for security analysis
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📄 **Security Policy Updates**
|
|
|
|
This security policy is reviewed quarterly and updated as needed to reflect:
|
|
- New threats and vulnerabilities
|
|
- Changes in security best practices
|
|
- Updates to compliance requirements
|
|
- Lessons learned from security incidents
|
|
|
|
**Last Updated**: January 2025
|
|
**Next Review**: April 2025
|
|
**Version**: 2.0 |